Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Hentges

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the district court for Houston county, where the action was tried by Farmer, J., and a. jury, a verdict rendered for the defendants, and a motion for a new trial denied.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Budge & llussell, otherwise known as “The Cedar Falls Scale Company,” were the owners of a patent for “the farmer’s sack-holder weighing scale.” They also held a contract executed to them by Essler, Norris & Doolittle, to manufacture these scales for them at seven dollars apiece. On March 8, 1875, in consideration of the notes in suit, Budge & Bussell sold to defendant Hentges the exclusive right to sell these scales in Vernon county, Wisconsin, for three years, and transferred to him the Essler, Norris & Doolittle contract, with the following written order indorsed thereon: “Deliver scales…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hopkins, Brother & Co. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1852
  2. Bruce v. . BurrNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Dyer v. GibsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Cardell v. . McNielNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  5. Young & Otis v. CovellNew York Supreme Court · 1811

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kiernan v. KratzOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  2. D. M. Osborne & Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Crane v. WheelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Bjornstad v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Ivenson v. CaldwellWyoming Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API