Legal Opinion

Harper v. BP Exploration & Oil, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 22, 2001No. 99-5442, 99-5472PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

This dispute over the district court’s award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, and Tenn.Code Ann. § 4-21 — 311(b), is before the court on the appeal of defendant, BP Exploration & Oil, Inc., and the cross-appeal of plaintiff, Paul Harper. On appeal, BP alleges that the district court abused its discretion by failing to reduce the fee award to account for time spent on what it considers unsuccessful, unrelated claims and by applying a contingency fee multiplier. Harper argues that the district court abused its discretion by reducing the hourly rate of one…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Gregory v. Shelby CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martha Dowling v. Litton Loan Servicing LPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Gross Ex Rel. Gross v. Perrysburg Exempted Village School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
  3. Citizens Against Pollution v. Ohio Power Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
  4. Doe v. University of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  5. Doe v. University of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API