Legal Opinion
Hoog v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided August 28, 2002No. 04-01-00239-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.
The State of Texas seized seventy-three head of cattle under chapter 821 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, alleging that Charles T. Hoog had cruelly treated the cattle. The county court found that Hoog had cruelly treated the cattle and ordered their sale at auction. Hoog appeals. We vacate the judgment of the trial court and dismiss the cause.
Background
The State seized seventy-three head of cattle, alleging in the warrant that Charles Hoog, their owner, had cruelly treated the animals. The cattle were placed in a feedlot. Castroville State Bank filed an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kroger Co. v. KengTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Continental Casualty Co. v. DownsTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Custom-Crete, Inc. v. K-Bar Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pine Forest Investments Group, LLC v. the County of Bastrop, Texas The Bastrop Independent School District And the City of Bastrop, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2018
- Robert Neal Pointer, Jose B. Ramirez, and Jose Mangawang v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- Robert Neal Pointer, Jose B. Ramirez, and Jose Mangawang v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- State v. $71,404.00 U.S. Currency, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2019
- in Re Debra Dickey, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013