Legal Opinion
Purdue v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 18, 2000No. 23084PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT S. BARNEY, Judge.
Timothy Purdue (“Movant”) appeals from the dismissal of his pro se Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court found the motion was filed out of time. This Court affirms.
Movant was convicted of assault in the first degree; § 565.050, RSMo 1994; and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction and sentence of two consecutive terms of life imprisonment. See State v. Purdue, 980 S.W.2d 600 (Mo.App.1998). Our mandate issued on December 24, 1998. Movant filed a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, *256whi…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- O'ROURKE v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Goodson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Day v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. CollierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baird v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- McCallum v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- in the Interest of A.C., Jr., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009