Legal Opinion

Murray Gold v. The State of Connecticut

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 25, 1976No. Docket 76-8031PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant is the defendant in a current trial for murder in the state court in Connecticut. Judge Zampano of the United States District Court for Connecticut refused to issue an order holding that the bail in which he is now being held in the amount of $200,000 is excessive and unconstitutional. We have carefully reviewed the papers and affirm his order.

Appellant also contends that his attorneys are being subjected to an unconstitutional “gag order” issued by the trial court which prevents any lawyers participating in the case from taking part in interviews for publicity and from making…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Wallace v. KernCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. State v. ChapnickConnecticut Superior Court · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mudd v. BusseDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1977
  2. DeMaria v. JonesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  3. Tsokalas v. PurtillDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
  4. Andersen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Andersen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API