Legal Opinion

Rheiner v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Washington county, McCluer, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

This action is based upon defendant’s alleged negligence in running a locomotive upon and killing plaintiff’s horses at a railroad crossing. At the close of plaintiff’s case the action was dismissed by the court. This was right, if, as defendant contends,, the evidence clearly shows contributory negligence on plaintiff’s part. It appears that, between 4 and 5 o’clock in the afternoon of October 17th, Hammerly, plaintiff’s servant, was driving the horses northerly up a street parallel to the railway. On his way he passed the locomotive, which was being run upon a turn-table on a switch track..…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Abbett v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Brown v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  3. Loucks v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  4. Donaldson v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  5. Hutchinson v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nosler v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API