Legal Opinion

NBZ Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Shakopee

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 11, 1992No. C0-91-2455PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

NBZ Enterprises, Inc., et ah, challenge the trial court judgment that a ready-mix concrete operation is not permitted under the Conditional Use Permit and Mineral Extraction and Land Rehabilitation Permit issued by respondent, City of Shakopee. The City of Shakopee filed a notice of review challenging the trial court’s reinstatement of appellant’s Conditional Use Permit.

FACTS

Appellants, NBZ Enterprises, Inc., et al. (hereafter NBZ), own and operate a sand and gravel mining business in the City of Shakopee, respondent. The sand and gravel pit is located in an area zoned as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Van's Material Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ash Grove Cement Co. v. Nebraska Dept. of Rev.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. R.A. Putnam & Associates, Inc. v. City of Mendota HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. Enterprise Citizens Action Committee v. Clark County Board of CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  4. White v. City of Elk RiverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Enterprise Citizens Action Committee v. Clark County Board of CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API