NBZ Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Shakopee
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
NBZ Enterprises, Inc., et ah, challenge the trial court judgment that a ready-mix concrete operation is not permitted under the Conditional Use Permit and Mineral Extraction and Land Rehabilitation Permit issued by respondent, City of Shakopee. The City of Shakopee filed a notice of review challenging the trial court’s reinstatement of appellant’s Conditional Use Permit.
FACTS
Appellants, NBZ Enterprises, Inc., et al. (hereafter NBZ), own and operate a sand and gravel mining business in the City of Shakopee, respondent. The sand and gravel pit is located in an area zoned as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Van's Material Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ash Grove Cement Co. v. Nebraska Dept. of Rev.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- R.A. Putnam & Associates, Inc. v. City of Mendota HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Enterprise Citizens Action Committee v. Clark County Board of CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- White v. City of Elk RiverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Enterprise Citizens Action Committee v. Clark County Board of CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1996