Legal Opinion

Bell v. Leiendecker

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1936No. 5294PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Judge.

Plaintiff herein, being desirous of obtaining the construction of a dwelling house on a certain lot in the city of Shreveport owned by her, signed, on August 14, 1935, a deed ■ conveying said property unto J. A. Leiendecker, defendant herein, for a recited consideration of $90 cash.

On that same date, the defendant Leien-decker executed a separate instrument in plaintiff’s favor in which he contracted and agreed to furnish all' labor and materials to build and erect a house on the lot, for the consideration of $1,341.43, and to convey the property to plaintiff on her finally…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Picard Const. Co. v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. McMillan v. LorimerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Warfield v. HamletSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1876
  4. Kaplan v. American Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
  5. Hill v. MaguireLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bourne v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Bell v. LeiendeckerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API