Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 10, 2000No. CIV.A. 93-891 SSHPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are (1) defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority’s (“WMATA”) motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, plaintiffs opposition thereto, WMATA’s reply, and supplemental notices of filing, and (2) plaintiffs motion to set a trial date, reconsider the dismissal of common law claims and amend the complaint, and defendant’s opposition and plaintiffs reply thereto. 1 In light of recent caselaw and upon consideration of the entire record, the Court grants WMA-TA’s motion and denies plaintiffs motion. “Findings of fact and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Robinson v. Detroit News, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Duncan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Ndzerre v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- White v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Owens v. National Medical Care, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.