Legal Opinion

Reger v. Sanchez

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1967No. 8239PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARMODY, Justice.

Plaintiffs’ suit was to enforce an oral agreement which allegedly extended the right of redemption in property sold at a foreclosure sale.- From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, the defendants appeal. We reverse.

Plaintiffs had been the owners of certain real estate which was sold at a foreclosure sale on October 22, 1962. The defendant was the. mortgagee and purchaser at the sale. The redemption period under a deed of-trust provided for a three-month, redemption period, which expired on January 22, 1963. It was claimed by the plaintiff and so found by the trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lumpkins v. McPheeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Schauer v. SchauerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Palmer v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Visic v. PaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Kenmare Hard Coal, Brick, & Tile Co. v. RileyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Cook v. Eastern Savings Bank, FSB (In Re Cook)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API