Legal Opinion

Lindsay-Felton v. FQSR, LLC

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided November 7, 2018No. Civil No. 2:17cv559PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark S. Davis, United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant FQSR, LCC, d/b/a KBP Foods, ("Defendant," or "KBP"). ECF No. 31. After examining the briefs and record, the Court finds that oral argument is unnecessary because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented, and oral argument would not aid in the decisional process. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b) ; E.D. Va. Loc. R. 7(J). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant's motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

I. Background

Plaintiff, Dena Lindsay-Felton…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martin v. Stateside Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
  2. Martin v. Stateside Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2025
  3. McCoy v. University of Virginia Medical CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2020
  4. Tommy Stith v. Stohlman Subaru of Herndon, LLC, d/b/a Stohlman Subaru of SterlingDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API