Legal Opinion

H. C. Tack Co. v. Ayers

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 12, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Bill to foreclose mortgage on real estate. Heard on bill, answers and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, V. C.

The only contested question in the cause is as to the order of priority between the complainant’s mortgage and a judgment held by the defendant Ayers, who, as he claims, has a lien upon an undivided portion of the mortgaged premises.

The premises in question consist of a lot of about one acre of unimproved and unoccupied land, devised by a father — David Wilson — to three brothers, Henry A., George L. and Charles B. Wilson.

On April 26th, 1882, the three brothers made a partition of the premises into three equal plots, by three several deeds, all bearing date April 26th, 1882, each…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knapp v. BaileySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
  2. Howard Insurance Co. v. . HalseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1853

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Majewski v. GreenbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  2. Michalski v. United StatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  3. Van Cleve v. MeyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  4. Battersby v. GillespieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Gawrillow v. RutkowskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API