H. C. Tack Co. v. Ayers
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Bill to foreclose mortgage on real estate. Heard on bill, answers and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
Pitney, V. C.
The only contested question in the cause is as to the order of priority between the complainant’s mortgage and a judgment held by the defendant Ayers, who, as he claims, has a lien upon an undivided portion of the mortgaged premises.
The premises in question consist of a lot of about one acre of unimproved and unoccupied land, devised by a father — David Wilson — to three brothers, Henry A., George L. and Charles B. Wilson.
On April 26th, 1882, the three brothers made a partition of the premises into three equal plots, by three several deeds, all bearing date April 26th, 1882, each…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Knapp v. BaileySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
- Howard Insurance Co. v. . HalseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
3Cited by5 opinions
- Majewski v. GreenbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Michalski v. United StatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Van Cleve v. MeyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- Battersby v. GillespieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- Gawrillow v. RutkowskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929