Alfred R. Dyer v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, of California State Prison at San Quentin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentBrunetti, Circuit Judge
THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, joining.
Today’s opinion sets forth a new rule of law that is a substantial departure from our precedent and deals a serious blow to the power of the trial court. Oür system of law mandates deference to the trial court on certain issues regarding facts and credibility of witnesses. Today, that deference is pushed aside so' that the appellate court may not only review the applicable laws, but also decide the facts. Our position has never been to sit as a finder of fact and I cannot support the extension of our power to do so. For the reasons that follow, I…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.