Legal Opinion

Kinkus v. Village of Yorkville

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 28, 2006No. C2-05-930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Robert Kinkus’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against Defendant Officer James Popp. 1 For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against Defendant Popp.

II. BACKGROUND

A. Facts

On September 18, 2004, weather conditions caused a flood in Yorkville, Ohio. 2 Because of the rising floodwaters, many of Yorkville’s streets were closed to traffic, including Ohio Route 7, the major street running through the Ohio River Valley.

On the day of the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kinkus v. Village of YorkvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. Kinkus v. Village of YorkvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API