Legal Opinion

Biederman v. FCA US LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 1, 2025No. 3:23-cv-06640Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FRANK BIEDERMAN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-06640-JSC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 9 v. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF 10 FCA US LLC, et al., INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 102, 109 12 13 Plaintiffs purchased RAM 2500 and 3500 pickup trucks (“Class Trucks”) installed with 14 alleged “defeat devices” that affected the emissions and performance of their diesel engines. In 15 this putative class action, Plaintiffs advanced 11 causes of action against Defendants FCA US 16…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. City Of Los Angeles, Harbor Division, A Municipal Corporation, Petitioner-Appellant v. Santa Monica BaykeeperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API