Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 7, 1976No. C 75-10-3335 Cr, CA 5863 and C 75-10-3356 Cr, CA 5864PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*653THORNTON, J.

The state appeals from a pretrial order of the circuit court which prohibited the prosecution’s undercover witness from testifying because his original written report describing the alleged purchase of heroin from the defendant had been destroyed by the police.'

Defendant was charged with criminal activity in drugs for allegedly selling heroin to an undercover police agent, Arthur Brewster. ORS 167.207. There is evidence, which, if believed, would establish that defendant sold heroin to Brewster on September 10, 1975 and October 1, 1975. Within 15 minutes of each sale, Brewster…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. City of Seattle v. FettigCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. State v. HockingsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. State v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. State v. WarrenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. AddicksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API