Legal Opinion

Harvin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 26, 1980No. 80-1606PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant seeks review of the summary denial of his motion under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850 to vacate the judgment and sentence entered against him after a guilty plea. The entry of the plea effectively waived his presently asserted claims that his confession to the crime was involuntary and that evidence against him was the product of an unlawful search and seizure; hence, these matters cannot be considered in a Rule 3.850 proceeding. E. g., Whitlow v. State, 256 So.2d 48 (Fla.2d DCA 1971); Hand v. State, 208 So.2d 307 (Fla.2d DCA 1968). Since there was no allegation that the plea itself was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whitlow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  2. Hand v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rosemond v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. State v. DukesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Van Fuquay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Cochran v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. KEENYA YOUNG v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API