Morales v. L. W. Blinn Lumber Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Dissent
CRAIG, Acting P. J.,
Dissenting. — I dissent. Where a new trial is granted for alleged insufficiency of evidence, unless it clearly appears that there was an abuse of discretion it is the rule that on appeal the order will not be disturbed. (Sawyer v. McRoskey, 32 Cal. App. 489 [163 Pac. 336]; Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. Krug, 89 Cal. 237 [26 Pac. 902]; Schramm v. Southern Pacific Co., 87 Cal. 425 [25 Pac. 481].) "To withhold a case from the jury is no greater interference than to set aside their verdict." (Bohn v. Pacific Electric R. Co., 5 Cal. App. 622 [91 Pac. 115]; Lynch v. Pacific Electric…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moss v. H. R. Boynton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. KrugCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Schooley v. Fresno Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Bohn v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
- Schramm v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.