Legal Opinion
Orick v. Banziger
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 8, 1996No. C-1-95-246PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*1087ORDER
SPIEGEL, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings (doc. 5), Plaintiffs’ response (doc. 9), Defendants’ reply (doc. 10) and Plaintiffs’ motion to file response instanter (doc. 11).
BACKGROUND
From January 4, 1993, until July 2, 1993, Plaintiffs, Kimberly Orick and April Pierce, were employed as “Habilitation Specialists” at Defendant Clermont County Board of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (the “Board”). Plaintiffs were probationary employees and members of the Clermont County Special Education…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Black v. Columbus Public SchoolsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000