Legal Opinion

Texaco, Inc. v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF MILLBURN TP.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 6, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

73 N.J. Super. 313 (1962)

179 A.2d 768

TEXACO, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MILLBURN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 8, 1962.

Decided April 6, 1962.

Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.

Mr. Francis E.P. McCarter argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. McCarter & English, attorneys).

Mr. Harold M. Kain argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, S.J.A.D.

The Law Division affirmed the action of the Millburn Board of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF NEWARKSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Reinauer Realty Corp. v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. FoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Tullo v. MILLBURN TP. CTY. OF ESSEXNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  5. West Hartford Methodist Church v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nani v. Zoning Board of Review of Town of SmithfieldSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  2. Metro 500, Inc. v. City of Brooklyn ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Zoning Board of Adjustment v. Dragon Run Terrace, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1966
  4. Metro 500, Inc. v. City of Brooklyn ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API