Legal Opinion

Securities and Exchange Commission, Henry C. Yuen Elsie M. Leung, Intervenors-Appellants v. Gemstar-Tv Guide International, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 12, 2004No. 03-56129PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEA, Circuit Judge:

I

We decide a question of first impression: whether under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”), 15 U.S.C. § 78u-3 (“Section 1103”), certain termination payments to high-level corporate officials are “extraordinary payments,” subject to involuntary retention in an escrow account compelled by court order. Because there was no evidence as to what would be an ordinary payment under comparable circumstances, we conclude that the district court erroneously determined certain payments proposed to be made by Defendant Gemstar-TV Guide International Inc. (“Gemstar”) to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. DirecTV, Inc. v. Hoa HuynhCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Atlantic Recording Corp. v. Project Playlist, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  3. DirecTV, Inc. v. Hoa HuynhCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. HeronDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. North American Broadcasting, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API