Legal Opinion

Succession of Anderson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1934No. 14686PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JANVIER, Judge.

This case presents only one question and that, one of law: Can a forced heir, a daughter who, in the will of her father, is not recognized as an heir, and who, by successful litigation against the executrix of her father’s estate, secures recognition as a forced heir, be compelled to pay a pro rata part, or, in fact, any portion of the fee of the attorneys employed by the executrix to resist the claim of the heir?

In the district court there was judgment in favor of the heir, Mrs. Irene Anderson Delsa, holding that she is not liable for any part of the fee referred to above. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Succession of AndersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  2. Succession of FilhiolSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  3. McNeely v. McNeelySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  4. Succession of BeauregardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
  5. Succession of MorèreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Bradenton v. State Ex Rel. PerrySupreme Court of Florida · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API