Legal Opinion

Ashley v. Kelley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1925No. 12,212Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

Nichols, C. J.

On rehearing, appellant earnestly contends that a statute of a state providing for one landowner to compel his adjoining neighbor to contribute to the building of a fence on the line between their lands for the exclusive benefit of another would be unconstitutional. That appellant has thereby presented no constitutional question, see, In re Petition of Pittsburgh, etc., R. Co. (1897), 147 Ind. 697, 47 N. E. 151; Durham v. State, ex rel. (1892), 133 Ind. 422, 31 N. E. 787; Hobbs v. Gibson School Tp. (1924), 195 Ind. 1, 144 N. E. 527; Ewbank’s Manual, (2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hobbs v. Gibson School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Durham v. State ex rel. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API