Legal Opinion

Thoms v. D. C. Andrews & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 9, 1931No. 31PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChase, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

Stripped of all nonessentials, this ease discloses a purchaser of goods, who had paid for them and left them with the seller to be shipped to him by the seller, seeking to recover from one whom the seller employed to act as its agent in forwarding the goods by water and to whom the seller had shipped them by rail to seaboard for such purpose, and who then, without notice of the true ownership, complied with the directions of its principal, the seller, to return the goods, in legal effect, to its principal from whom they had been received.

Under the facts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. North Pennsylvania Railroad v. Commercial Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. In re Columbus Buggy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  4. Howell v. MorlanIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Gurley v. ArmsteadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kentuckiana Healthcare, Inc. v. Fourth Street Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Kentuckiana v. Fourth StreetCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API