Legal Opinion

Howell v. Morlan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1875PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of White county; the Hon. Tazewell B. Tanner, Judge, presiding. This was an action of assumpsit, by Jonah Morlan, against William A. Howell, James W. Millspaugh and Charles Carroll, partners, to recover for the loss of a lot of oats. The opinion of the court gives the material facts of the case.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by appellee in the circuit court of Gallatin county, against appellants, to' recover for a quantity of oats which were delivered to appellants, as wharfingers, to be forwarded, as claimed by appellee, to John T. Moore & Co., of New Orleans, which order appellants failed to observe, but shipped the oats, to another party, who failed, in consequence of which the oats were lost.

The venue of the. cause was changed to White county, where, at the November term, 1873, a trial was had before a jury, which resulted in a verdict in favor of appellee for $433.23.

T…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cook v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Lewis v. Galena & Chicago Union RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Hagler v. MercerSupreme Court of Florida · 1856

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kooyenga v. Hertz Equipment Rentals, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Zahorka v. GeithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. O. K. Transfer & Storage Co. v. NeillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Tynan v. WeinhardIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. WinglerIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API