Port Arthur Towing Company v. Mission Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentFay, Circuit Judge
With great respect and affection for my sisters, I dissent. Under Texas law prevailing at the time Mission issued the contested policy, any contractual attempt to foreshorten the claim period to a time less than two years rendered the limitation clause void. Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5545 (Vernon 1958). At the time it issued the policy, Mission knew that their standard clause limiting the claim period to twelve months was void in Texas. To reinstate a valid claim period limitation, Mission could have added to Port Arthur’s policy a specific endorsement limiting the claim period to a specific…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Republic National Bank of Dallas v. Northwest National Bank of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Holston v. Implement Dealers Mut. Fire Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- American Surety Co. of New York v. BlaineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Culwell v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- National Military Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.