Legal Opinion
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 28, 2007No. 06-3365UnpublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Darlene King appeals the district court’s denial of her “Motion to Amend or Alter” the order denying her application for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand for consideration of the merits of the application.
I. BACKGROUND
On December 20, 1999, appellant filed an application for supplemental security income before an Administrative Law Judge (the “ALJ”). The ALJ denied benefits, and this denial became the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) on March…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Trustees of the Umwa Combined Benefit Fund, (99-6110), Secretary of Health and Human Services, (99-6111)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Willis v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stephens Ex Rel. RE v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Bryant v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Hogan v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2008
- Wasniewski v. Grzelak-JohannsenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Quade Ex Rel. Quade v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.