Legal Opinion

Holloway v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 1, 2004No. A04A1627PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Gary Mitchell Holloway appeals his conviction for child molestation, 1 contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict because: (1) the testimony of the victim was not credible and equivocal and (2) the State failed to prove the requisite intent. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

The standard of review for the sufficiency of evidence, in reviewing either a motion for a directed verdict or a motion for new trial, is whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Ney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Branam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Susan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Enurah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Gary Mitchell Holloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API