Legal Opinion
Matheny v. Maier (In re Maier)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided February 8, 2013No. Case No.: 3:12-bk-283-JAF; Adv. Pro. No.: 3:12-ap-688-JAFPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chapter 7
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT
JERRY A. FUNK, United States Bankruptcy Judge
This proceeding is before the Court on the Debtor, Albert Carl Maier’s (“Defendant”), Motion to Dismiss the Complaint Objecting to Discharge (Doc. 5, the “Motion to Dismiss”; see also Doc. 1, the “Complaint”). Plaintiff, Steele Matheny, t/a Steele Construction Co. (the “Plaintiff’), filed a response in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6). For the reasons set forth herein, the Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part.
Background
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- In Re Seymour Chalik, Debtor. Seymour Chalik v. Harold D. Moorefield, Jr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Meridian Bank v. Eugene Alten, Marlene Alten, and Thomas J. Subranni, Trustee Eugene and Marlene AltenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sears v. SearsDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2015
- Vara v. Bristol, Jr.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021