Avant v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellants were convicted by a jury of obtaining money from the complaining witness, one Fletcher, by falsely representing to him that certain repairs had been made and certain parts replaced in his automobile. 1
We will limit our comments on the evidence for it is our conclusion that the case must be retried. In September 1958 Fletcher took his automobile to the Credit Auto Repair Service to have specific repairs made. He conversed with appellant Avant concerning the work. The following day Avant called Fletcher and recommended additional work he considered necessary,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- People v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. SchmittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. DaenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Rand v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Otis Avant and Fleet S. HughlettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Willgoos v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- United States v. BethasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960