Legal Opinion
In Re Promulgation of Guardianship Services Regulations
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 30, 1986PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
O’HERN, J.
It has long been recognized that freedom of personal choice in matters of family life is one of the liberties protected by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution. Zablocki v. Redhail, 434 U.S. 374, 385, 98
S.Ct. 673, 680, 54 L.Ed.2d 618, 630 (1978) (quoting Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632, 639-40, 94 S.Ct. 791, 796, 39 L.Ed.2d 52, 60 (1974)).
The history and culture of Western civilization reflect a strong tradition of parental concern for the nurture and upbringing of their…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- State v. P.Z.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- New Brunswick Savings Bank v. MarkouskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- JE on Behalf of GE v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- In re Certificate of Need Granted to the HarborageNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.