Legal Opinion

Hemenway v. Miller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1991No. 56430-2Published

1Opinion of the Court

116 Wn.2d 725 (1991)

807 P.2d 863

ROBERT W. HEMENWAY, ET AL, Respondents,

v.

MARGARET MILLER, ET AL, Petitioners.

No. 56430-2.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

April 4, 1991.

As amended by order June 10, 1991.

Breskin & Robbins and Arnold B. Robbins, for petitioners.

Robert A. Wolle, for respondents.

[Dissent amended by order of the Supreme Court June 10, 1991.]

BRACHTENBACH, J.

This is an action by the original makers of a promissory note who claim they became sureties by operation of law when a third party assumed the obligation to pay the note. The makers of the note allege that the payee of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. The National Shawmut Bank of Boston v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
  3. Chelan County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. County of ChelanWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Fluke Capital & Management Services Co. v. RichmondWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hemenway v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API