Curtis Jackson v. Aramark Food Services and Mike Church (mem. dec.)
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Apr 04 2019, 8:31 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals estoppel, or the law of the case. and Tax Court APPELLANT PRO SE ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES Curtis Jackson Christopher D. Cody Branchville, Indiana Georgianna Q. Tutwiler Hume Smith Geddes Green & Simmons, LLP Indianapolis, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Curtis Jackson, April 4, 2019…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Evans v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Bueter v. BrinkmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Town of Ellettsville, Indiana Plan Commission and Richland Convenience Store Partners, LLC v. Joseph v. DeSpiritoIndiana Supreme Court · 2017