Legal Opinion
Teleconference Systems v. Proctor & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 25, 2009No. Civil 09-200 (JBS/JS), 09-632 (JBS/JS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOEL SCHNEIDER, United States Magistrate Judge.
This Opinion addresses whether these consolidated patent infringement cases should be litigated in the District of Delaware or the Northern District of California. For the reasons to be discussed the Court finds that these cases should be transferred to California. 1
This matter is before the Court on the following motions: “Motion to Stay” [C.A. No. 09-200, Doc. No. 13] filed by defendant Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”), “Motion to Stay Proceedings” [Doc. No. 17] filed by the Cisco defendants 2 , “Motion to Stay (Renewed)” [C.A. No. 09-200,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kallman v. AronchickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Wacoh Co. v. Kionix Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Apeldyn Corp. v. Sony Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Reassure America Life Insurance v. Midwest Resources, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Technology Licensing Corp. v. Thomson, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.