Legal Opinion

Henry v. Henry

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In this case, an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the jury returned a verdict awarding the plaintiff punitive damages but no compensatory damages. The defendant moved to excise the punitive damage award or grant a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The court granted a new trial on the plaintiffs motion. We find no error or abuse of discretion and affirm.

Background

[¶2.] The facts are fully detailed in Henry v. Henry, 534 N.W.2d 844 (S.D.1995) [Henry I ]. We will not discuss them at length here. Briefly, Lois and Harold Henry divorced on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tibke v. McDougallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Grynberg v. Citation Oil & Gas Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Stene v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Jensen v. WeyrensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Christians v. ChristiansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Stabler v. First State Bank of RoscoeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. McDowell v. Citicorp U.S.A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Harris v. Jefferson Partners, L.P.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Hoaas v. GriffithsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API