Henry v. Henry
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] In this case, an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress, the jury returned a verdict awarding the plaintiff punitive damages but no compensatory damages. The defendant moved to excise the punitive damage award or grant a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The court granted a new trial on the plaintiffs motion. We find no error or abuse of discretion and affirm.
Background
[¶2.] The facts are fully detailed in Henry v. Henry, 534 N.W.2d 844 (S.D.1995) [Henry I ]. We will not discuss them at length here. Briefly, Lois and Harold Henry divorced on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Tibke v. McDougallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Grynberg v. Citation Oil & Gas Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Stene v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Jensen v. WeyrensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Christians v. ChristiansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Stabler v. First State Bank of RoscoeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- McDowell v. Citicorp U.S.A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Harris v. Jefferson Partners, L.P.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Hoaas v. GriffithsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.