Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Rapanos v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 19, 2006No. 04-1034Published

1Concurring in the judgmentJustice Kennedy

These consolidated cases require the Court to decide whether the term “navigable waters” in the Clean Water Act extends to wetlands that do not contain and are not adjacent to waters that are navigable in fact. In Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook Cty. v. Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U. S. 159 (2001) (SWANCC), the Court held, under the circumstances presented there, that to constitute “ ‘navigable waters’ ” under the Act, a water or wetland must possess a “significant nexus” to waters that are or were navigable in fact or that could reasonably be so made. Id., at 167, 172. In the instant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API