Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided April 17, 2015No. Case No. 14-2539-JWLPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Emmett V. Jordan and Amy R. Jordan, individually and on behalf of their minor child, filed a petition and then an amended petition in state court under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 alleging that defendants violated their Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights in connection with defendants’ seizure and subsequent sale of plaintiffs’ property to satisfy the tax indebtedness of plaintiffs Emmett and Amy Jordan, delinquent taxpayers. The seizure was executed by agents of the Kansas Department of Revenue (KDOR) and the Wyandotte County…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. M.C. Through Chudley v. Shawnee Mission Unified Sch. Dist. No. 512District Court, D. Kansas · 2019
  2. Halik v. PinnockDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
  3. McNamara v. HallinanDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
  4. TSI Technologies LLC v. CFS Brands, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API