Carlton v. . Bernhardt-Seagle Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
The single question presented by this appeal is whether there was competent evidence to sustain the award.
If the findings of fact of the Industrial Commission are supported by competent evidence,- they are conclusive upon appeal. Southern v. Cotton Mills, 200 N. C., 165.
The defendants, however, contend that tbe evidence offered was incompetent, and therefore insufficient to support the award. In Brown v. Ice Co., 203 N. C., 97, Brogden, J., speaking for the Court, used this language: “Obviously, if all the testimony offered by a claimant, tending to show an injury sustained in the course of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Southern v. Morehead Cotton Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Russell v. Western Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Tapp v. Dibrell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
3Cited by16 opinions
- Penland v. BIRD COAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Fox v. Cramerton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Edwards v. . Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Thomas v. Raleigh Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Maley v. . Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.