Legal Opinion

Hofland v. Elgin-Butler Brick Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided June 4, 1992No. 13-91-141-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERTO HINOJOSA, Justice.

This is a dispute over the sale and conversion of 650,000 brick. Border Brick and Supply, Inc., and Joyce Hofland, a director and share holder in Border Brick, appeal from a judgment finding them liable to Elgin-Butler Brick for conversion of these brick. We affirm.

Elgin-Butler and Border Brick had an agreement by which Elgin-Butler sold brick throughout the Rio Grande Valley and Border Brick collected payments. Border Brick took a percentage for collection and other services, and sent the money to Elgin-Butler. They also had a lease agreement permitting…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Croucher v. CroucherTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Gaddis v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Burns v. Rochon, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  2. Cass v. Stephens, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  3. Autry v. Dearman, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  4. Wells Fargo Bank Northwest, N.A. v. RPK Capital XVI, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2012
  5. Varel Manufacturing Co. v. Acetylene Oxygen Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API