Legal Opinion

PatentWizard, Inc. v. Kinko's, Inc.

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided September 27, 2001No. Civ. 00-4143PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PIERSOL, Chief Judge.

Defendant, Kinko’s, Inc. (Kinko’s), has filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint filed against it by Plaintiffs PatentWizard, Inc. and Michael S. Neustel. For the reasons stated below, the Motion to Dismiss is granted.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Michael Neustel is a patent lawyer from North Dakota, who, according to the Complaint, has a national reputation in the field of patent law. Neustel’s law firm, in which he is the sole principal, owns and operates plaintiff PatentWizard. From the Complaint, it appears that PatentWi-zard markets software aimed at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  2. Kenneth M. Zeran v. America Online, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  3. Krentz v. Robertson Fire Protection DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ArdenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Barrett v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Delfino v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Gentry v. eBay, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. M.A. ex rel P.K. v. Village Voice Media Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API