PatentWizard, Inc. v. Kinko's, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PIERSOL, Chief Judge.
Defendant, Kinko’s, Inc. (Kinko’s), has filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint filed against it by Plaintiffs PatentWizard, Inc. and Michael S. Neustel. For the reasons stated below, the Motion to Dismiss is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Michael Neustel is a patent lawyer from North Dakota, who, according to the Complaint, has a national reputation in the field of patent law. Neustel’s law firm, in which he is the sole principal, owns and operates plaintiff PatentWizard. From the Complaint, it appears that PatentWi-zard markets software aimed at…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Kenneth M. Zeran v. America Online, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Krentz v. Robertson Fire Protection DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
3Cited by15 opinions
- Johnson v. ArdenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Barrett v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Delfino v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Gentry v. eBay, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- M.A. ex rel P.K. v. Village Voice Media Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.