Legal Opinion

Patterson Enterprises, Inc. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 28, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-2373-JWLPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on defendant Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.’s (“Firestone”) motion to dismiss (Doc. # 7). Firestone brings this motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(7) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to join a real party in interest. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

7. Facts

The following facts, as alleged by the plaintiffs, are accepted as true for the purposes of this motion to dismiss. Patterson Enterprises, Inc. (“Enterprises”) and Patterson Farms Trucking (“Trucking”) are…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Robert Garcia v. Douglas E. Hall and Danny L. MangusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Griffin v. Dana Point Condominium Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. Lindsay v. KvortekDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Borgeson v. Archer-Daniels Midland Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1995
  4. Bennett v. Mackinac Bridge AuthorityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. North American Mechanical Services Corp. v. HubertDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API