Schramm v. Dotz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
1. Arbitration. Defendant contends that the action cannot be maintained because the insured failed to resort to arbitration before bringing action. In a well-reasoned and helpful opinion, the learned circuit judge decided that ch. 298, Stats., has created exclusive remedies for the enforcement of agreements to arbitrate, which were unenforceable at common law; and that defendant, by its conduct in intentionally and consistently seeking a dismissal of this action rather than a statutory stay for the purpose of arbitration, had waived its right to insist on arbitration as a condition precedent…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Indiana Insurance v. Noble Ex Rel. JordanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- Radlein v. Industrial Fire & Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Lynch v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Collicott v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Simpsen v. Madison General Hospital Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.