Rickstrew v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey
In these cases, the defendants claim that a section of Colorado’s vehicular homicide statute, prior to its amendment in 1989, was vague and therefore void under the due process clauses of the Colorado and United States Constitutions. Gonzales failed to preserve the void for vagueness issue at trial; we therefore dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted in *506his case.1 As to Rickstrew, because we find no infirmity in the statute, either facially or as applied to him, we affirm the court of appeals.
I
In February 1988, Rickstrew was convicted by a jury of vehicular homicide and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- People v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- People v. NormanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Parrish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Swieckowski Ex Rel. Swieckowski v. City of Fort CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- People v. BaerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- People v. HolmesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Sales v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.