Hotel Cecil Co. v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered September 6, 1917, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing consolidated actions for damages.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
These two cases, practically identical as to the facts stated in the complaints, so far as the *461law governing them is concerned, were consolidated in the trial court for the sake of convenience, and are so presented here. We use the case of the Hotel Cecil Company, a corporation, appellant.
According to the complaint, appellant, a private corporation, on December 8, 1916, was the owner of a restaurant and grill room in Seattle. The complaint states:
“On the 8th day of December, 1916, the defendant, through its duly constituted authorities, determined that said place of business of this plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miller v. HortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Howard v. Tacoma School District No. 10Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Russell v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Lynch v. City of North YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- City of Orlando v. PraggSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hagerman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Kilbourn v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Town of Othello v. HarderWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Jolly v. FossumWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- State ex rel. Sayles v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.