Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Flick

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1941No. 35,154PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action by one member of a law partnership for an accounting, and in a second cause of action, to enforce a provision in the partnership contract whereby a partner had agreed not to practice law in the county where the partnership was located for ten years after a dissolution of the partnership. Judgment was for the defendant, denying the injunctive relief, and for the plaintiff as to the accounting. The plaintiff appeals from so much of the judgment as denied the injunction and from certain phases of the accounting. The defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chouteau v. Jupiter Iron WorksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. Hobbs v. Columbia Falls Brick Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Eddy v. St. Charles Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fast v. KahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  2. Bailey v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  3. Marsh v. Coleman Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  4. Beacon Wireless Solutions, Inc. v. Garmin International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API