Harlow Corp. v. Bryant Exploration & Production Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSEN, Presiding Judge:
Appellant initiated this action, seeking to have the court declare null and void certain mineral leases Appellees had obtained through assignment from a third party, Mid-State Exploration, and to enjoin Appel-lees from interfering with Appellant’s rights under its allegedly valid leases.
Both Appellant and Appellee Bryant Exploration had procured mineral leases covering portions of the same property. Willow Pipeline operated the gas gathering system on the property covered by the leases, and Appellant also sought to enjoin Willow’s operation of the system,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Sisney v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- City National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma City v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Butcher v. McGinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Nu-Pro, Inc. v. GL Bartlett & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
3Cited by7 opinions
- Head v. McCrackenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Boyd Rosene and Associates, Inc. v. Kansas Municipal Gas Agency, an Interlocal Municipal Agency City of Winfield, Kansas, a MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Voiles v. Santa Fe Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Myers v. MyersCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.