Legal Opinion

In re Faler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 3, 1936No. 32,994; No. 32,995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

These consolidated appeals are from judgments of the district court of Montgomery county which denied writs of habeas corpus applied for by the petitioners.

The material facts are these:

On December 21, 1935, one Thad E. Hummell swore to a complaint before E. J. Humphrey, a justice of the peace in Rogers county, Oklahoma, in which it was charged that on- or about September 17, 1935, in Rogers county, Oklahoma, these petitioners, Laney and Faler, willfully and feloniously and by false and fraudulent representations did obtain 50 shares of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matter of StraussSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. State v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  4. In re FlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tingley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Busey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  3. Wilson v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Petty v. MorrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API