Legal Opinion

Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 11, 2014No. 13-1339PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This successive appeal requires us to review for the second time the dismissal of Stanley Smith’s complaint in his employment-discrimination lawsuit. Our recent decision in Luevano v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 722 F.3d 1014 (7th Cir.2018), compels the opposite conclusion reached by the district court, and thus we vacate and remand.

In his initial complaint, Smith alleged, that his former employer, Union Pacific Railroad (for whom he worked as an engineer), discriminated against him in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., because of his alcoholism.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tara Luevano v. Walmart Stores, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Mark F. Elmore v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Midwest Community Health Service, Inc., Now Known as Silver Cross Health System v. American United Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lewis v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Carr v. HooksDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  3. Carr v. HooksDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
  4. Carter v. Illinois Gaming BoardDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API