Legal Opinion
Washburn & Moen Manuf'g Co. v. Haish
United States Circuit Court
Decided December 15, 1880PublishedCited by 9 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the CourtDeummoND, C. J.
These are two of a series of 14 cases brought by the plaintiff upon the chancery side of this court, for an injunction and damages by reason of tne alleged infringement by defendant of certain patents owned by the complainants, relating to barbed fence wire. By the first suit the plaintiffs allege .that they are the owners of the following patents, issued by the United States: (1) Patent No. 67,117, issued July 23, 1867, to William D. Hunt, and re-issued, No. 6,976, March 7, 1876, to Charles Kennedy, assignee of William D. Hunt; (2) patent No. 150,683, issued May 12, 1871, to Joseph…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Powder Co. v. Powder WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Russell v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Goodyear v. DayU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1852
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lowell v. TriplettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Edison Electric Light Co. v. Electric Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1893
- Valvona v. D'AdamoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1905
- Bryce Bros. v. Seneca Glass Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern West Virginia · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.