Legal Opinion

Valley Public Service Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1945No. 30131PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

First to be disposed of will'be two questions raised su,a sponte, to wit: (1) Is the commission’s order a final order? (2) Is appellant aggrieved by the order appealed from?

As defined in Section 12223-2, General Code, an order affecting a substantial right made in "a special proceeding is a final order.

In the case of Ohio Contract Carriers Assn., Inc., v. Public Utilities Commission, 140 Ohio St., 160, 42 N. E. (2d), 758, it was held:

“Appeal lies only on behalf of a party aggrieved by the final order appealed from. Appeals are not allowed for the purpose of settling abstract questions, but…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ohio Contract Carriers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Minerva-Canton Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Middleton v. Huntington National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API